IPv6 Transitional Myths by Geoff Huston

By November 26, 2010 Governance No Comments

Geoff Huston imageWith the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 becoming ever more important due to the likely exhaustion of IPv4 addresses in mid-2011, a guru on the topic, Geoff Huston, has written about some of the transition myths.

Myths covered by Huston in his posting with brief excerpts to his responses are:

  • We have many years for the transition to IPv6 – No!
  • “Its just a change of a protocol code. Users won’t see any difference in the transition.” – If only that were true!
  • “NAT upon NAT upon NAT will work” – Maybe
  • “Changing the Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) is easy” – No, not necessarily.
  • “My ISP has enough IPv4 addresses to last for years, so they don’t have a problem” – Well, not necessarily
  • “We will always have to run IPv4 protocols” – Probably not
  • “There is a technology that will translate between IPv4 to IPv6” – Yes, but.
  • “We don’t necessarily have to transition to IPv6. There are substitutes.” – Nothing is visible from here!
  • “We know what’s happening” – I’m not sure that’s universally true!
  • “We know what we’re doing” – Individually this is, hopefully true
  • “We have a plan!” – See above.
  • “The Internet will be fine!” – I’m unsure about this one.
  • “The incumbents will have all the IPv4 space. Thanks for playing.” – If that’s not a myth, then we are going to be in serious trouble!

Obviously Huston goes into more detail in his posting, se to read it in full, see: